Skip to main content
← Blog
AI AgentsHypemarc AI Team

Marblo Build Notes 2 — Completing a Mission with the Closed Loop

Marblo Build Notes 2 — Completing a Mission with the Closed Loop

Assigning site improvements as a mission

A mission such as “build an app” calls for deciding what to implement, assigning the work, and verifying the result. Marblo's closed loop connects those steps through communication between the orchestrator, board agents, and system.

In the October 2026 improvements to hypemarc.com, a positioning review and design audit led to improvement tickets. Worker PRs went through review and merge gates, and changes to security paths were handed to independent testing. Production deployment was checked after merging.

Part 1 introduced the release's features. Here, we follow how the closed loop connected the actual work.

People set direction; the orchestrator assigns work

The orchestrator created and assigned tickets for a CEO-perspective positioning review and a design audit. The two reports led to phase 1 and phase 2 improvement tickets.

The CEO used the orchestrator's Telegram reports to set direction: replace unverified figures with qualitative descriptions and replace examples with actual Marblo use cases. Those decisions guided the workers' improvements.

For a team considering adoption, this division of responsibility is useful to examine. People decide the product's message and supporting evidence; the orchestrator creates and assigns work under that direction.

From reports to improvements: what the four PRs did

Workers acting as board agents produced four PRs. Each change covered:

  1. CEO positioning review report: reviewed the site's positioning from a CEO perspective.
  2. Design audit report: audited the design and produced a report.
  3. Phase 1 improvements: cleaned up unverified wording, accessibility, and the header.
  4. Phase 2 improvements: turned /agents into Marblo use cases and refined the home page hierarchy.

The reviews and audits provided the basis for improvements, which became subsequent tickets and implementation work. The orchestrator and board agents carried the reports into follow-up assignments.

Security path changes go to an independent tester

Worker PRs passed through the orchestrator's review and merge gates. Changes to security paths triggered an automatic handoff to an independent tester. A separate verification role examined the implementing worker's result.

In this example, security path changes were the work connected to risk-based independent testing. Teams can distinguish implementation completion from independent verification.

Check production deployment after merging

The improvements proceeded from PR submission and merging through production deployment confirmation. Review and merge gates and deployment checks were part of the same improvement mission.

ParticipantRole in the hypemarc.com improvements
HumanDeciding to replace unverified figures with qualitative descriptions and replace examples, then checking results
OrchestratorCreating and assigning review and audit tickets, connecting reports to improvement tickets, and handling review and merge gates
Board agents / workersCarrying out assigned work and submitting PRs
SystemAutomatically handing security path changes to an independent tester
Independent testerIndependently verifying the changes handed over

Work and results moved between these participants to carry the mission forward. People set direction and checked results. The orchestrator, board agents, and system connected task creation, assignment, and verification handoffs.

Where development resources go

The efficiency change in this example concerns who connects the work. Turning review results into improvement tickets, assigning them to workers, and handing them over for verification happened within the mission flow. The human role focused on direction and checking results.

This is not a measurement of time or cost savings. The example shows how work from reviews and audits progressed through improvements and verification to a production deployment check. Teams evaluating a mission workflow can examine how far those connections extend.

In this series

MARBLO

Running it beats reading about it

Marblo is a desktop app for macOS and Windows. Connect the CLIs you already pay for, run a different model per ticket in parallel, and approve before anything merges. The free plan runs one project, so you can check it today.

Marblo Build Notes 2 — Completing a Mission with the Closed Loop - Hypemarc Blog | Hypemarc